Control - Founder vs. VC

What the greatest technology investors say about Control - Founder vs. VC

Fred Wilson: Thoughts on Well-Functioning Boards

Fred Wilson venture capitalist and Co-Founder Union Square Ventures

“Every company should have a Board of Directors. []  [Benefits] include [] advice, counsel, relationships, experience, and accountability.

[Shareholders] elect the [Board] [] [usually via] a nominating entity that puts directors up for election by the shareholders. []

[Wilson likes] a three person Board early on in a company's life [including the founder with two others he trusts and respects].

[] [Investors sometimes negotiate a Board seat - less common for angels, moreso for VC’s].”

A founder can still control a three or five person Board.  “As a company moves from founder control to investor control, [an independent director is considered]. [] [Wilson likes] independent directors [].  The more independent minded the Board [], [usually the better].

[][Wilson argues] that an investor controlled Board is the worst possible situation” since an investor’s interest is narrowly his financial return, not a broader company perspective. “[Investor directors should not control the board.] The founder should control the board in a company he [] controls and independent directors should control a board where the founder does not control the company.

[] [Boards should evolve, recruit new members regularly and have term limits]”, preferably 4 years. 

“Most importantly, build a great board.”  Fred Wilson, The Board Of Directors - Selecting, Electing & Evolving, Mar 12, 2012;